3/19/2023 0 Comments Harrison mpc5 vs mixbus 32c![]() ![]() I'm sure there are other differences, too, that aren't important to me but would probably be worth the different in cost and screen real estate for a real working DAW-user. The 32C has more buses and different algorithms in the equalizer section that make it sound more like a Harrison Series 32 EQ than a generic four-band semi-parametric general purpose EQ, neither of which appeals to me enough to upgrade from the $19 version to the $99 version. I don't have to "build" a channel before I can use it. To me, the advantage of MixBus is that everything that's on my console is there, right in front of me. And I believe that starting out as a console builder gave them look-and-feel experience to create a program that would be reasonably comfortable for one who mixes in the traditional way, and that's me.ΔΆ0 years ago, I'd say "I'd consider replacing my console with a computer if I had a monitor the size of my console." Now that a console the size of Keith's is affordable, I don't really have the interest any more, but I've looked into a multi-fader control surface and a large monitor and think that I could get comfortable with it if I wanted to. It started with Ardour as a base, and Harrison, who was an active supported of the Ardour project, gained a lot of experience in working with it as a component of their large frame consoles from a dozen or so years back. I don't like any one DAW program better than another because I don't use any of them enough to really learn what I could like or dislike, but about Harrison, mostly what I like is the company and how the program was developed and evolved. I've been keeping up with their basic MixBus, it's currently, and frequently on sale for $19. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |